May 20, 2024
Business Intelligence
Negotiation is at the heart of business. Whether securing a supplier contract, hiring talent, or pitching investors, deals determine success. Yet some still view negotiation as a zero-sum game – if someone wins, someone else must lose. This adversarial mindset not only harms relationships and stifles creativity but can even spark conflicts that eradicate value.
The savviest negotiators embrace a collaborative, win-win approach instead. By understanding interests over positions and emphasising shared goals, they expand the pie before splitting it up. The result? Deals that benefit both sides over the long term through mutual satisfaction.
Classic hard-bargaining tactics focus on positions—a party’s stated desires, such as price, deadlines, or deliverables. Negotiators quickly stake out extreme positions and work towards a compromise. This style naturally creates conflict and resistance, though, especially around “must-haves.”
In win-win negotiation, understanding why parties take certain positions matters more than what those positions are. Their interests, priorities, and motivations reveal much about the reasoning behind their positions.
Suppose a key engineering hire negotiates for remote work flexibility during interviews. Some founders may instantly resist offering full-time remote out of principle or fears about productivity and culture.
By uncovering interests first, both parties gain insight. Perhaps the recruit needs to care for family members during certain hours. The flexibility itself holds more importance than working remotely every single day.
This insight opens doors to creative, mutually acceptable possibilities – like offering remote work options 2-3 days per week or flexible daily hours. Had either side focused solely on their position around remote work, no suitable middle ground may have emerged.
Mastering conflict resolution skills helps uncover hidden interests driving positions, too. Avoid judgmental language. Ask curious questions. Name the common goals both sides share. If negotiations grow tense, suggest taking a quick break to reset the tone – a tactic professional mediators use.
Skilled negotiators prepare well before sitting down at the bargaining table. They research and anticipate their needs, know their BATNAs and WATNAs (best and worst alternatives to a negotiated agreement), and aim to build positive rapport.
Yet less experienced negotiators often overlook the needs of the other party. Entering a negotiation blind to the opposing side’s priorities, constraints, and interests, even though creativity suffers. Without context, mismatched priorities pit parties against each other.
Thorough preparation must include digging into the other player’s world. Search public information on priorities, challenges, and negotiating history. Speak to others who have sat across the table from them before. Learn their typical constraints – everything from budgets to internal approval processes and sacred cows.
The more homework completed, the better positioned you are to offer proposals aligned with shared interests right from the start. Consider gaps needing to be bridged, too. If both parties gain more insight into the factors driving those gaps, fresh solutions often emerge to close them.
While some see negotiation as a tug-of-war over a fixed bounty, inventive dealmakers search for goals both sides share at their core and craft expansive solutions no single party may have conceived alone. They seize the opportunity to pioneer value rather than just claim it.
Uncovering mutually compatible interests requires listening closely to what the other side reveals verbally and nonverbally while suspending initial judgments. Parties may use different language or expressions to capture overlapping goals. Creative negotiators connect those dots.
Think beyond the deal immediately on the table, too. Will both parties gain through an ongoing partnership? Does this negotiation merely represent the opening bid in a long-term relationship? What doors could collaborating open down the road?
Perhaps two small but complementary businesses negotiate over a potential merger. Combining forces may help them compete against more prominent players through expanded capacity. They share an interest in increased scale and exposure.
Rather than initially haggling over quick-win details like valuation or founder titles, the leadership teams may first envision what each unique capability allows the merged entity to accomplish in the future that neither could pull solo. With mutual interest around an ambitious strategy, the deal’s structure often becomes more apparent.
Even with aligned interests, parties naturally see things from their vantage point first. This limits objectivity around what represents a fair deal. After all, what may seem reasonable to you may strike the other side as untenable, and vice versa.
Maintaining empathy helps. Regularly reflect on how proposals and trade-offs look through the lens of the party across the negotiating table. If you walked a mile in their shoes, what tweaks would make an offer truly irresistible?
Complex negotiations often represent a symptom of tension and underlying mistrust between parties, not just clashing positions. Reframing proposals around understanding rather than accusation or assumption goes far. “I see how this structure better aligns with your growth strategy” carries more weight than “You clearly don’t understand our needs.”
Explain respectfully how certain requests prove difficult on your end, too. Transparency around constraints builds trust. If common ground feels lacking, ask the other party how they interpret your shared interests. They may articulate certain shared goals you have never recognised before.
Even with solid preparation and relationship building across the table, stalemates crop up. When facing non-negotiable constraints that limit manoeuvring room, shift gears. Brainstorm inventive ideas and alternatives that address core interests rather than getting stuck defending one specific approach or position.
Too often, negotiators lock themselves into binary positions – Plan A or Plan B. If A falls through, then only B will suffice as a backup. This rigidity ignores the spectrum of possibilities hiding between points A and B, though.
Professional mediators excel at this. When tension escalates, they explore hypotheticals to redirect parties toward untapped potential. An independent mediator, internal innovation team, or even a respected friend could introduce creative possibilities without the emotional investment during tense moments.
Do not expect to reconcile all differences overnight, either. For incredibly complex negotiations, agree to sleep on options if progress stalls—Reconvene in a few days with fresh solutions in hand. The space for reflection works wonders.
In business, few opportunities prove one-shot passes. Word spreads quickly about unscrupulous negotiators who misrepresent truths or leave the opposing side dissatisfied through tricks. Over time, counterparts grow reluctant to engage again once distrust takes root, which hurts deal flow and outcomes long-term.
Plus, “bully” negotiator styles conflict directly with win-win shared success mindsets. Hardball tactics that pressure counterparties unfairly often backfire through resentment and resistance. They diminish rather than expand value overall.
Esteemed negotiators like William Ury instead commit to ethical standards—building trust, avoiding misrepresentation, keeping promises, and not taking advantage of others even when power dynamics tempt them.
Support claims with evidence, data, and facts. Admit to mistakes publicly, then redress them. Follow through on concessions promised. Hold up your end of bargains struck. These practices become reputation currency that unlocks better deals over time.
Adopting a win-win collaborative negotiation mindset requires patience and practice, especially if hardball deal-making has been rewarded in the past. But business proves a long game. Destructive styles eventually catch up through damaged relationships and partnerships never formed from fear and scepticism.
Preparation sets the stage, from knowing oneself to walking miles in the shoes of counterparts before talks commence. Creativity stems from expansive thinking—uncovering shared interests and room for mutual gain rather than attacking positions. And ethics cannot be sacrificed. They determine the tenor of future negotiations as much as the bargains struck in the current one.
No overnight fixes exist. But over time, as more leaders commit to understanding first and partnering around common goals, the negotiating environment shifts – from adversarial tension towards shared innovation. And better business outcomes follow.